Osama Al Sharif

By : Osama Al-Sharif

As the deal with Iran over its nuclear program went into effect this week a new chapter in Tehran’s relations with the world was heralded. It is a victory for diplomacy, as President Barack Obama said, but more importantly it is a triumph for Iran’s moderates, or so it seemed. The deal will almost certainly reduce tensions between Iran and the international community paving the way for normalizing the Tehran’s relations with the West, but much rests on its willingness to open a new page with its neighbors as well.

The lifting of nuclear-related sanctions will boost Iran’s struggling economy and will have positive effects on its citizens who for decades have paid a hefty price for their country’s bellicose regional policies. The question now is will Iran’s leaders manage to make the transition from the revolutionary mode into a normal state-like reality?

Skeptics believe that the religious conservative institution, which is made up of clergy and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, that has ruled Iran since the overthrow of the Shah in 1979 will not give in easily. The triumph by the reformists will not be allowed to come at the expense of the conservative institutions that have much to lose. President Hassan Rouhani’s optimism about the future may be short lived. Upcoming parliamentary and the more important Assembly of Experts elections will be a litmus test of the mood of the clergy and of the ailing supreme leader Ali Khameini.

While Israel insists that the nuclear agreement was a bad deal and that Iran’s hard-liners will continue to pursue a belligerent policy toward the Jewish state and Tehran’s neighbors, the Obama administration believes that Iran’s opening up to the world will help the reformists at the end of the day. The internal struggle between conservatives and reformists will continue for some time and it is unlikely that Tehran’s regional policy will witness much change in the near future.

The recent diplomatic escalation between Saudi Arabia and Iran will further polarize the region and complicate regional crises in Syria, Iraq and Yemen. When it comes to defining Iran’s role in the region the clerical institution seems to have the upper hand. This is why Gulf countries view with suspicion Washington’s approach toward Iran in spite of US assurances to GCC leaders. On the ground Iran has done little to convince its Gulf neighbors that it was ready to alter its position on Yemen, which has become a geopolitical challenge for Riyadh and its allies.

By the same token Tehran continues to play a negative role in Iraq; fueling sectarian confrontations and presenting itself as a guardian of the country’s Shiites. In Syria Iran’s military involvement has prolonged the civil war and hardened the position of the regime preventing a political transition there.

The nuclear deal will not amend Tehran’s controversial approach to regional crises or force it to review its agenda. On the contrary, with billions of dollars now made available to the government the conservatives will be enticed to boost Iran’s regional ambitions. It is unlikely that President Rouhani and his allies will be able to steer away from the current policy any time soon.

This was made apparent when Tehran was quick to respond to new sanctions imposed this week over its ballistic missile program by vowing to press ahead to develop its military capabilities.

The big change in Iran will come from the Iranian people themselves. Iran’s economy has suffered over the past decades from international sanctions but mainly from the country’s confrontational policies in the region. With unemployment rates reaching record levels among young men and women it is clear that the conservatives have failed to deliver on promises for a better future. Iran’s youth will be the major force behind dramatic changes inside that country. And since the clerical institution will not give in easily, or even through the ballot box, as the experience of former President Mohammad Khatami has shown, one could predict that the internal struggle may turn into an open and dangerous confrontation.

Of course the present US policy toward Tehran may change if a Republican president is elected in November. Ironically, while renewed US-Iran confrontation will please Tehran’s regional detractors, it could also derail attempts by moderates and reformists to reduce the influence of conservatives and stem the country’s foreign ambitions.

The coming weeks will be important in determining if Tehran’s opening up to the world will affect its current policies in the region. There is no doubt that President Rouhani, who staked his presidency on the success of the nuclear negotiations, will attempt to use the popular euphoria over the lifting of sanctions to his advantage. But it is too early to assume that the firm grip of the ayatollahs over the country’s affairs will loosen soon.

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in the Column section are their own and do not reflect RiyadhVision’s point-of-view.

Related articles across the web

• Iran gets ready to deliver nukes
• Tehran's Damascene Moment?
• Iran's October missile test violated U.N. ban, expert panel says
• Iran's Soleimani met Putin in Moscow
• Some Iran Sanctions Could Be Lifted As Soon As January
• German Machine Tool Federation to Open Office in Tehran
• Iran Calls Closure of UN Nuclear Arms Probe a 'Big Success'
• US congress calls for more sanctions on Iran after missile test violated U.N. ban
• Iran Campaigns to Join World Trade Organization
• Will Syria become Russia's Vietnam?